Category Archives: Pat Lynch

Strong Mayor

An essay by Pat Lynch

Voting time again. This is generally a ho-hum election because there’s no big sexy neck-and-neck contest to rivet us. Jerry Brown will likely sail through and, unlike Scotland, the wannabe separatist counties in California haven’t managed to get their rural independence cravings on the ballot. But we do have our local propositions.

Prominent among them is Measure L, the Strong Mayor proposal. Many oppose the Strong Mayor scheme because, apparently, they have read American urban history. They recall Strong Mayor (“Boss”) Daley who ran the infamously crooked Chicago political machine. Then there’s Boss Tweed of Tammany Hall who orchestrated the high-functioning New York operation that cranked out batches of strong mayors, patronage and graft. Tweed biographer Kenneth Ackerman asserts, “the Tweed ring at its height was an engineering marvel, strong and solid, strategically deployed to control key power points: the courts, the legislature, the treasury and the ballot box. Its frauds had a grandeur of scale…money laundering, profit sharing and organization.” In sum, the Tweed era was a heyday for expansion, and insiders—developers especially– got rich and richer.

The power grab excesses of Strong Mayors are pretty much legendary, that is, if one takes the time to research. Our current mayor wants to be one of the strong ones. He spent most of his last State of the City speech orating about the King Arena. He pushed through a publicly subsidized arena even though Sacramentans twice voted down this subsidy. Bankrolled by developers, his priorities are clear. His champions are rich. What chance do mere pipsqueak citizens have against this array of power and money?

Take heart. Last year in Columbia, South Carolina, citizens opposed a Goliath Strong-Mayor coalition made up of the Governor (Nikki Haley), a former governor, the Chamber of Commerce, the mayor of Charleston, and the State newspaper editorial board. “Never doubt the power of a small group of citizens coming together and working together,” said Kit Smith, one of the Davids who slew the giant. Said another, in defense of the City Manager-Council form of government, “If it’s not broken, don’t break it.”

Portland is so charming and successful a city that a TV series presently satirizes its more far-out residents.  You know a city has arrived when Hollywood acknowledges and exploits it. Portland thrives. It retains a Mayor-City Manager-City Council form of government. Why? Because people there believe that “shared leadership is better than centralized power.” Portland also employs its City Council as a “governing board that focuses on coherent policymaking and oversight of administrative performance.” Sounds like checks and balances to me. Simply, shared power is bound to be more representative, more democratic.

I don’t think we should pass a Strong Mayor ordinance in Sacramento. We need to pass a Clean Vote ordinance that keeps big money out of our city politics so we don’t become a cesspit of slippery, greed-based deal-making, nepotism, and patronage like our State Legislature (where mandatory ethics training is now instituted–too little, too late, in my view). No, we don’t need a strong mayor. But how about a Smart Mayor ordinance?

This is not to say that our mayor isn’t smart, but when the bulk of the State of the City speech goes to sports arena accomplishments, that’s simply not smart enough. The Smart Mayor ordinance will give the mayor his council vote and the right to use his office to advance worthy policy. He can promote the Kings all he wants. He can even wear their purple suits to meetings. But he will be required to work with the council to repair the parks and preserve the tree-lined neighborhoods (he lives in one) that make us, like Portland, a destination. He will be required to use his bully pulpit to hold developers to much, much higher environmental standards. He will have to put poverty, air quality and crime on the front burner and declaim relentlessly on these issues to TV and Bee reporters. The mayor has, because of office, an automatic public forum. That is power. To use that power for good is virtue. Maybe that’s the law we need, a Virtuous Mayor Ordinance.

Smart, virtuous politicians doing the right thing, uninfluenced by big donors? Not a chance, you say. Maybe. But it will be our fault if we don’t pay attention and thwart as many bad schemes as we can. We can start with rejecting Measure L. I know, we voted Strong Mayor down before. But it’s back. Think of voting it down again the way you think about your flu shot: something healthy you keep having to do. The flu comes back every year too. But we don’t have to catch it.

 

Posted in Pat Lynch | 5 Comments

A world class city loves its past and protects and preserves its neighborhoods

AN217208_942long

I took a walk one cool October morning in the Southwark (pronounced Sutthick) section of London, an area that had once been the district of “brothels, bawds and bards.” Here in the reign of Queen Elizabeth the First, theater, bear baiting, prostitution and other interesting recreations took place; here were the pubs and the Clink, the notorious prison from which subsequent jails took their name. I passed an actual wall of the actual Clink, passed the ground level bars from where the incarcerated would thrust their arms and hands at passersby. Prisoners were not fed, and had to beg friends and family to pass food through the bars. It doesn’t take much to imagine oneself in that time. I would have been bringing food to my brother, Danny, a red-headed Irishman who would surely have been up to no good in Elizabethan England. But how to distinguish Danny’s hand from all the others? We would have worked out a code–crossed fingers or something. And it would have been smart to bring food for everybody, so my brother wouldn’t have to fight to keep his.

This is how you amuse yourself strolling these historic streets. The weather’s perfectly encouraging. I peeked into an open doorway, entered an empty room. There was a giant hole in the floor, surrounded by strings of orange lights. I went to the hole and looked down into the motionless green water of the Thames. Someone came up behind me. “Yes, that’s the river,” she said. “Do you know what they found down there?”

I said I imagined gold, or jewels, some kind of sunken treasure, and she said with a smile that that was the general response of Americans. And it was a treasure they had found. It was the old Rose Theater. “You’re kidding,” I said. “They found the Rose? Shakespeare? Marlow?” I added the names to let her know that despite our gold-crazed imaginations, Americans knew who had written for the Rose. She led me into another room and told the story. This site had been slated for development—a high-rise office building. Workers began turning the earth and odd objects popped up. A almost intact money-pot, for example. It was an earthenware Elizabethan pot with a slit in it. It was used to collect pennies from “groundlings” who would pay to stand and watch the play. If people could afford it they could put another penny in another pot and buy the right to be seated. When the play was done and the audience gone, the pots were broken open. After the discovery of these particular money-pot remnants preservationists swooped over the site. The development was halted.

The woman showed me copies of another discovery—there was gold after all–a gold ring engraved with these words, in French: “Pences Povr Moye DV—(Remember me, God willing).” I bought one. I wonder how that person in the late 1500’s felt after losing that ring at the Rose Theater. He or she couldn’t know that five-hundred years later an American would buy a copy of it for twenty pounds, couldn’t know that its discovery would help launch a London preservationist movement to resurrect the old theater.

The recovery of the Rose is a story of values. Historians and an informed public fueled the campaign to preserve the site. The office high-rise was finally resumed, but only over the top of the revived theater, which is preserved beneath. Notably, this has been called “one of the weirdest sights in London.” But never mind that it’s weird; what matters is that the Rose is there, alive again, and flourishing. The woman who sold me the ring was a young Shakespearean actor. She said Titus Adronicus was performed here. Titus Adronicus was Shakespeare’s Jaws, an early, gory thriller crafted to titillate the groundlings.

Returning to our VRBO I wandered back in time. My family traced our DNA though National Geographic and learned our genetic roots are deeply embedded in Ireland and along the coast of England. Might an ancestor have come to the Rose Theater? Maybe. She would have been a groundling for sure, but happy to pay her penny to see a show. She was likely a mother of a batch of children because large families bettered your odds of offspring surviving plagues and living to adulthood. My ancestor would have brought her children to the theatre, maybe after taking them to hand lunch down to their uncle in the Clink. She would not have let them watch bear baiting, no matter how they clamored. I’m as sure of this as I am that there were Roman mothers who forbade their young to watch lions eating people. But she would have loved the plays. And as she listened she might have heard something extraordinary in young Shakespeare’s offerings. Plays weren’t published for common reading then, but a couple of his long narrative poems had become popular. She would not have been able to read them because women of her class were largely illiterate. But her sons would have attended the excellent Elizabethan free grammar schools for boys, and maybe they could have read them to her. Or maybe her brother, released from the clink, and provided hefty cups of good ale, would have read Venus and Adonis aloud to his female kin.

These are the small journeys imagination takes when you visit a truly world class city that loves its past and fights to preserve its neighborhoods.

Pat Lynch

Posted in Pat Lynch, Uncategorized | Comments Off on A world class city loves its past and protects and preserves its neighborhoods