Category Archives: Essays

Features and essays

A world class city loves its past and protects and preserves its neighborhoods

AN217208_942long

I took a walk one cool October morning in the Southwark (pronounced Sutthick) section of London, an area that had once been the district of “brothels, bawds and bards.” Here in the reign of Queen Elizabeth the First, theater, bear baiting, prostitution and other interesting recreations took place; here were the pubs and the Clink, the notorious prison from which subsequent jails took their name. I passed an actual wall of the actual Clink, passed the ground level bars from where the incarcerated would thrust their arms and hands at passersby. Prisoners were not fed, and had to beg friends and family to pass food through the bars. It doesn’t take much to imagine oneself in that time. I would have been bringing food to my brother, Danny, a red-headed Irishman who would surely have been up to no good in Elizabethan England. But how to distinguish Danny’s hand from all the others? We would have worked out a code–crossed fingers or something. And it would have been smart to bring food for everybody, so my brother wouldn’t have to fight to keep his.

This is how you amuse yourself strolling these historic streets. The weather’s perfectly encouraging. I peeked into an open doorway, entered an empty room. There was a giant hole in the floor, surrounded by strings of orange lights. I went to the hole and looked down into the motionless green water of the Thames. Someone came up behind me. “Yes, that’s the river,” she said. “Do you know what they found down there?”

I said I imagined gold, or jewels, some kind of sunken treasure, and she said with a smile that that was the general response of Americans. And it was a treasure they had found. It was the old Rose Theater. “You’re kidding,” I said. “They found the Rose? Shakespeare? Marlow?” I added the names to let her know that despite our gold-crazed imaginations, Americans knew who had written for the Rose. She led me into another room and told the story. This site had been slated for development—a high-rise office building. Workers began turning the earth and odd objects popped up. A almost intact money-pot, for example. It was an earthenware Elizabethan pot with a slit in it. It was used to collect pennies from “groundlings” who would pay to stand and watch the play. If people could afford it they could put another penny in another pot and buy the right to be seated. When the play was done and the audience gone, the pots were broken open. After the discovery of these particular money-pot remnants preservationists swooped over the site. The development was halted.

The woman showed me copies of another discovery—there was gold after all–a gold ring engraved with these words, in French: “Pences Povr Moye DV—(Remember me, God willing).” I bought one. I wonder how that person in the late 1500’s felt after losing that ring at the Rose Theater. He or she couldn’t know that five-hundred years later an American would buy a copy of it for twenty pounds, couldn’t know that its discovery would help launch a London preservationist movement to resurrect the old theater.

The recovery of the Rose is a story of values. Historians and an informed public fueled the campaign to preserve the site. The office high-rise was finally resumed, but only over the top of the revived theater, which is preserved beneath. Notably, this has been called “one of the weirdest sights in London.” But never mind that it’s weird; what matters is that the Rose is there, alive again, and flourishing. The woman who sold me the ring was a young Shakespearean actor. She said Titus Adronicus was performed here. Titus Adronicus was Shakespeare’s Jaws, an early, gory thriller crafted to titillate the groundlings.

Returning to our VRBO I wandered back in time. My family traced our DNA though National Geographic and learned our genetic roots are deeply embedded in Ireland and along the coast of England. Might an ancestor have come to the Rose Theater? Maybe. She would have been a groundling for sure, but happy to pay her penny to see a show. She was likely a mother of a batch of children because large families bettered your odds of offspring surviving plagues and living to adulthood. My ancestor would have brought her children to the theatre, maybe after taking them to hand lunch down to their uncle in the Clink. She would not have let them watch bear baiting, no matter how they clamored. I’m as sure of this as I am that there were Roman mothers who forbade their young to watch lions eating people. But she would have loved the plays. And as she listened she might have heard something extraordinary in young Shakespeare’s offerings. Plays weren’t published for common reading then, but a couple of his long narrative poems had become popular. She would not have been able to read them because women of her class were largely illiterate. But her sons would have attended the excellent Elizabethan free grammar schools for boys, and maybe they could have read them to her. Or maybe her brother, released from the clink, and provided hefty cups of good ale, would have read Venus and Adonis aloud to his female kin.

These are the small journeys imagination takes when you visit a truly world class city that loves its past and fights to preserve its neighborhoods.

Pat Lynch

Posted in Pat Lynch, Uncategorized | Comments Off on A world class city loves its past and protects and preserves its neighborhoods

Nail Biter

tempest in District 3First, what exactly is a tempest in a teapot? Basically, it’s froth. It simmers, it bubbles, it boils, but the heat is contained in a small vessel, and in the end serves up little more than a modest cup of tea. This is how I think we should assess the “concession” drama in the District 3 council race. First, a reporter wrote excitedly that candidate Ellen Cochrane, a surprisingly strong contender, had conceded. She had dropped to third place and in a post to supporters she sounded as if she had done the math. She had. But she did not concede.

A voter called her. “My wife says you didn’t concede, but I want to be sure,” he said. She told him she didn’t, and wouldn’t till all votes were in. Others asked the same or similar questions and she gave the same answer. Still others called to tell her they refuted the concession rumor. My question is this: why didn’t the Bee reporter who wrote the article call her first to check the facts? He is paid to ascertain accuracy. He could have picked up the phone and clarified the issue permanently. Instead he assembled a story based on assumptions.

He did return her call when she called the Bee editorial department, then left him a message from Hawaii. “If you weren’t sure about my intentions, why didn’t you contact me?” she asked. His answer was that he discussed the matter with colleagues, political consultants, and someone from the News and Review. Now. Is it persnickety to suggest that News and Review colleagues might know a bit less about a subject than the subject herself?

More years ago than it is polite to tell, I took a few college journalism courses from Ms. Miriam Young, a fastidious lady with a mitigated Texas drawl. Ms. Young would tolerate no shortcuts. “Go to the source, go to the source, go to the source,” she would say. Our reporter might have profited from that class. The old fundamentals still apply: go to the source. Was the candidate premature in her statement? Yes, decidedly. Hers was an unsophisticated, issue-oriented, grass-roots campaign funded entirely by small donors who were District 3 neighbors and property owners. She had no high-paid consultants to advise her about political protocol or strategy. She was not part of the insider city bureaucracy. But the concession tempest is not the big story of her campaign.

The big story is this. Though she entered too late to secure endorsements, she made neighborhood preservation and quality of life prominent issues. She had a brave idea. She had gumption. She had a small team who believed in her, and trusted her vision. She answered questions frankly, then explained how she arrived at her conclusions. She didn’t dodge, duck or equivocate. One woman said, “I never met a politician like you before.” Neither had we. We liked the candidate she became: a principled advocate for the under-represented, a force for a clean vote and ethical politics. A great many people from East Sacramento, River Park and South Natomas responded to this and supported her. How she pulled this off in an election where developers finance candidacies and the traditional media anoint themselves kingmakers is the real story. The big headline from District 3 should read, Neighbors Have Champion. Everything else is a tempest in a teapot.

Pat Lynch

Posted in Essays | Comments Off on Nail Biter